Skepticism is a good thing to a point. It was reached some time ago with Able Danger. Why do people have such doubts about Able Danger? What exactly is the point of besmirching the honor of a Naval Officer who has shown his dedication to the defense of his country by throwing away his career to make the point that Able Danger not only existed but identified the terrorists? Why is it required to make fun of Rep Curt Weldon for his book as if he published some sort of rant about flying saucers instead of a terrific book that outlines the threat of Iran? Are those who laugh at Rep Curt Weldon absolutely certain that Iran means us no harm even in the face of evidence just last week of their shipping weapons capable of destroying our tanks? What is the purpose of the current skepticism?

Finally if what is the purpose of muddying the waters? Fun? Remember 2 of the Hijackers were identified...not just Atta.
JustOneMinute: Able Danger - Muddying The Waters

Reference Article