Thought it was pretty radical when Ann Coulter suggested that the New York Times building might have been a better target for Timothy McVeigh. But lately given their leap not merely to being wrong but being on the other side I now get it. Why am I so angry because the MSM is actively working to defeat us in our War on Terror. Actively, understand the word? Every single deed they do is driven with the purpose of setting back our actions.

Why isn't mainstream American hearing about stories like this terrific story highlighted by Blackfive? Because to hear stories like this does not serve their purpose, which is to defeat our efforts in the central front of the war on terror! Iraq has been and will continue to be absolutely the center of gravity in the WoT because of who it is we are fighting. We aren't fighting the Protestants in England, or the Hindus in India we are fighting the Islamic "Holy" warriors and they live primarily in the ME.

None of that matters to the MSM. Which is why I have come around to the point of view of Ann. The colonic affect of the New York Times building crumbling from a terrorist attack might be enough to actually get them back on our side instead of the other side. Though in the face of the sort of mentality of Mike Wallace that might require the USA Today building to collapse as well.

BLACKFIVE: Saving Private Ali - The Rest of the Story

Reference Article